Critical Materials Atlas
Critical material · profile · CN 2804 69 00

Silicon, < 99.99%

China leads both the mining and the export of silicon, < 99.99% — a genuine, not an accounting, concentration.

47/100
supply-risk index
<50%
US import reliance
🇨🇳 China
lead miner · 73%
🇨🇳 China
lead refiner · 79%
🇨🇳 China
top exporter · 40%
0.20
export concentration (HHI)

Primary uses. aluminium alloy casting; silicones chemical production; semiconductors; solar cells.

China’s share of world silicon, < 99.99% exports, 2002–2024: 28% ↑ 40%

The chain — from the ground to the buyer

A critical material passes through distinct stages, and the country that leads each stage is often different — that gap is what this atlas exists to show. Each layer comes from a different public source with its own vintage, labelled below; shares are % of the world total.

● Reserves — where it could come from

Reserves are the deposits known to exist and economically worth mining — the long-run ceiling on supply, distinct from what is actually produced today. USGS does not publish country-level reserves for silicon — typically because it is a by-product of another ore or is drawn from an effectively unlimited source (e.g. quartz, seawater), so a national reserve map does not apply. USGS 2024 · reserves as of 2023

not available

● Mined — where it is dug up today

Mining is where ore leaves the ground — the stage most people equate with “the source”, though it is rarely where the supply risk actually concentrates. Output is concentrated: 🇨🇳 China supplies 73%, with 🇷🇺 Russia (7%) next. That is effectively a single-country dependence — one government's policy or one region's disruption can move the entire upstream. USGS 2024 · 2023 production

🇨🇳 China73%
🇷🇺 Russia7%
🇧🇷 Brazil4%
🇳🇴 Norway4%
🌍 Others (not detailed)12%

● Refined / processed — where it becomes usable metal

Refining / processing converts ore into the metal or compound buyers actually purchase; it concentrates in fewer hands than mining and sits at the buyer's doorstep, which is why it is usually the true chokepoint. 🇨🇳 China processes 79% — highly concentrated. China leads both mining and refining, so its grip is structural rather than a pure processing gate. On the buffers: 0% of supply is recovered from end-of-life recycling and substitutes are scarce, while the US imports <50% of what it consumes. USGS MCS 2024

🇨🇳 China79%
🇧🇷 Brazil5%
🇳🇴 Norway4%
🇫🇷 France2%
🌍 Other countries10%

● Recycling & substitutability — the mitigants (EU CRM)

0% of supply comes from recycling end-of-life products — there is essentially no end-of-life recycling, so a disruption has no secondary cushion. Substitutability is high — few or no alternatives, so a disruption bites hard.

● Traded — who ships it

Actual bilateral trade of the traded form, reconciled from UN Comtrade / CEPII BACI. Pick a year below — 2018–2024 measured, 2025* nowcast, 2026** directional scenario. The full 2002–2026 range is on the interactive atlas.

year2024
Top exporters — reconciled trade, 2024
Countrysharevaluetonnes$/t
🇨🇳 China40%$1.5B710.8 kt$2,149/t
🇳🇴 Norway13%$487M188.0 kt$2,594/t
🇧🇷 Brazil12%$463M170.0 kt$2,721/t
🇫🇷 France6%$218M76.3 kt$2,860/t
🇨🇦 Canada3%$129M39.4 kt$3,272/t
🇦🇺 Australia3%$117M40.9 kt$2,857/t
Top importers — reconciled trade, 2024
Countrysharevaluetonnes$/t
🇩🇪 Germany15%$580M228.7 kt$2,538/t
🇺🇸 United States13%$513M165.9 kt$3,089/t
🇯🇵 Japan10%$380M172.7 kt$2,201/t
🇹🇭 Thailand8%$314M85.4 kt$3,678/t
🇲🇾 Malaysia5%$195M71.3 kt$2,741/t
🇮🇳 India5%$183M89.9 kt$2,032/t

Context

A critical material where the EU is genuinely diversified: origin is Norway (~47%), Brazil and Iceland - not a dependency risk. The naive view still misleads (Germany 44%), but the honest finding here is 'no concentration'. Included to show the method measures rather than confirms.

Explore silicon in the atlas → The origin gap Methodology

Every figure on this page is computed from out/data.json and out/flows_2024.json by build_profiles.py — no hand-entered numbers.